On May 01, 2007, at 04:40 UTC, Tim Hare wrote: > I was surprized by how much overhead there actually was. While it is > indeed minor, given the non-optimizing compiler, it is a valid > optimization.
I'm picking nits here, but it's not right to say that RB uses a non-optimizing compiler. It's been doing optimizations for years, and probably does some by now that I don't even know about. We may wish for it to do more optimizations, or certain optimizations, but it's certainly not accurate to say it does none. Best, - Joe -- Joe Strout -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
