On 30-Jul-07, at 11:16 AM, Michael Williams wrote:
> Gotcha,
>
> So you're recommending going the "dylib" route as opposed to the
> plugin route? What kind of recommendations have you for actually
> distributing the "dylib"? Someone mentioned actually placing the
> "dylib" in the RB package, I'm not terribly familiar with that
> process, nor how to reference a self-contained library.
>
> Michael
you can use a "special" name for a dylib in OS X that permits you to
locate it relative to the actual executable
instead of
Soft declare sub/function name lib "lib name" ....
use
Soft Declare Sub/function name Lib "@executable_path/../
Frameworks/lib name" ....
and then in the OS X version you copy your dylib into the FrameWorks
folder in the package
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
