From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 12:02:20 -0400 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: real server versus http server 

Hi, 
So does that mean if I encode a file for surestream with backward 
compatibility for RP5, and I http stream the file it will play on a rp5 at 
the one rate.? 
Camille Daniels 

***************************
Moderator Note:
Since the use of backward compatibility requires Sure-Stream and
Sure-Stream cannot be web streamed the answer would therefore be no.
***************************

At 06:12 AM 8/27/99 -0700, you wrote: 
> 
> 
>From: "Mandy Vance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>Subject: Re: real server versus http server 
>Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 18:16:46 -0700 
> 
>I have been reading about this... 
>You CAN use an http server, (this is explained in the Product Guide for Real 
>Player G2, in .pdf format) but you just can't get the streaming capabilities 
>you can get with the Real Server. Of course, it all depends on what you want 
>to do. For example, I have recently been experimenting with encoding real 
>media files for different bit rates (16 kbps, 32 etc.) You can actually make 
>one .rm file that will have a different coding for each bit rate. So as soon 
>as someone opens their realplayer, the player will automatically choose 
>which bit rate is good for that computer's specifications. It's pretty cool, 
>but won't work without a RealServer. 
>Mandy 
> 
> 
>-----Original Message----- 
>From: RealForum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>Date: Thursday, August 26, 1999 4:13 PM 
>Subject: real server versus http server 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 12:45:12 EDT 
>>Subject: real server versus http server 
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> 
>>I upload my promo content in an HTTP server just to check the quality, 
>>buffering, etc. it works fine. I thought I couldn't do that. I thought you 
>>can serve real content ONLY from a Real server.Anybody can tell me where is 
>>the differce? thanks. 
>>Nicoletta Jacobacci 
>> 
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to