On 09-Jan-02, Allen Kamp wrote: > I've been sitting back holding off commenting, but can't hold off > forever. If you really want to make it easier for maintenance > programmers, all I can say is to repeat the Designer's Tip Sheet.
> Tip #7 Code in Style > "REBOL is a highly dynamic language that allows massive creative > freedon in script's design. But, when it comes to the source format > of your script, use the standard style (found in the REBOL User's > Guide). Adhering to a standard style will make your script easier > for you and others to read" > I see little point in using a style different to the style that is > in used REBOL itself. For one thing the source function loses some > of its utilty if you have to mentaly map from the standard > formatting to your own style. But RT could change the output with the next release of REBOL. > If you have trouble reading the > standard style, then maybe you haven't truly learnt to read REBOL > yet. (or you might be carrying too much baggage from past > languages.) Nah - it's to get away from the look of other languages and to have a more REBOL-like style - to emphasize the blocks as much as possible. Plus, it's just plain better. > Please stick to the standard guide as much as you can, at the very > least please stick to it for posts to this list. When in Rome... etc Vote? > Cheers, > Allen K > [close vent] (: -- Carl Read -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
