Charles wrote:
>
>>How long has it had the "OS" in its URL? That certainly gives it a
>>REBOL flavor.
>>
> My question is, how in the world does it qualify as an "OS"?
One word: Marketing ;)
> Absolutely agreed. But then you end up with "channel packages", like in
> cable TV, whereby a few "good" channels are grouped with a selection of crappy
> ones no one wants, simply so they'll be included. Heaven forbid the popular
> ones get money while the unpopular ones die. Oh well.
Define popular. On second thoughts, don't. We've already gone down that road
with the argument about web browsers haven't we ;)
Chris
--
.------{ http://www.starforge.co.uk }-----. .--------------------------.
=[ Explorer2260, Designer and Coder \=\ P: TexMaker, ROACH, site \
=[___You_will_obey_your_corporate_masters___]==[ Stack: EETmTmTRRSS------ ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
