I have met complex women and seen glorious sunsets! I admit I have yet to run into one complex XML document "in its full glory". Please, someone enlighten me, what am I missing here :-?
Michael -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christian Langreiter Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 9:02 PM To: Petr Krenzelok Subject: [REBOL] Re: Google + SOAP > You haven't answered why you consider Rugby being blocking one ;-) I > tried Ruby several times and it does some 250 RPC echos in a sec ... > So, what is enough for you? :-) I'm not talking about speed or Rugby's efficiency, which is certainly admirable, but there are things Rugby can't do anything about ... Rugby is blocking when executing long-running functions, like doing data analysis involving data gathering from multiple data sources (and many scenarios more). I've just had a look at the cooperative threading model, and it might be good enough for a lot of cases (though, in general, I don't like coop multithreading too much, it usually complexifies otherwise simple programs enormously). > PS: what does your grin mean? Do you know something we don't? :-) Unfortunately not. That's why I am asking here ... BTW, Roger Sessions may well talk a lot of nonsense, but his observation regarding SOAP I support. SOAP is (rather) complex when compared to XML-RPC or REBOL messaging. It is probably extremely simple simple when compared to CORBA. And he who deems "XML" simple hasn't seen it in its full glory. -- Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
