Well REBOL/Base is great but I'm more interested in ADDING than REMOVING functionality from REBOL ;)
Enough of sarcasm for today ;), bye, bolek -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Petr Krenzelok Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] Re: rebol/base [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Does anyone else think the naming of base and core are reversed? Seems >that core would be the smallest, 'core' piece of rebol, and base would >add features on top of the core. > >I don't know what that means for >the /view question. Maybe /viewcore and /view? or /view and /view+ >Just please not view++ :-) > >mike > > I don't want to participate in name election, as it is imo pretty irrelevant right now. I think that the most important factor is to get things done in the right way :-) Anyway - why to confuse outside world with other names? If we want to introduce all - core, view, command, link in their base versions, just let's combine refinements ;-) rebol/core/light rebol/view/light rebol/command/light or rebol/core/base rebol/view/base rebol/command/base KISS :-) -pekr- -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes. --- Příchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolováno antivirovým systémem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.391 / Virová báze: 222 - datum vydání: 19.9.2002 --- Odchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolováno antivirovým systémem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.391 / Virová báze: 222 - datum vydání: 19.9.2002 -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
