> Andreas Bolka wrote.. apparently on 19-Apr-2005/0:29:19+2:00
>>Monday, April 18, 2005, 10:33:37 PM, Graham wrote:
>>
>>> As for posting, I'll have to discuss with Carl. Posting the schemes,
>>> modified or not, seems to be a breach of the sdk license.
>>
>>even though they are available under system/schemes/.. in standard
>>REBOL/Core ?
>
> Correct. Here's the header from prot-http.r
>
> REBOL [
> Title: "REBOL Protocols: HTTP"
> Author: "Sterling Newton"
> Rights: "Copyright REBOL Technologies 1997-2002"
Forgive my possible misconception, but doesn't the 2002, being
in the past, mean it's no longer valid?
I'm usually not interested in legal stuff, so I don't really know..
-Izzy Boy
> Note: "Confidential and Proprietary. All rights reserved."
> ; CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY OF REBOL TECHNOLOGIES, USA.
> ; This source code module shall only be used according to
> ; the terms and conditions of the REBOL/SDK license.
> ; This source code is not for distribution or publication.
> ; All changes or modififications must be submitted to REBOL.
> ]
>
> I believe Carl is working on a new license for LNS .. maybe that will
> percolate back to the sdk sources.
>
> --
> Graham Chiu
> http://www.compkarori.com/cerebrus
> http://www.compkarori.com/rebolml
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
