On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:21:15 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is sometimes called "stickyness". People come visit the site, > check out a few pages, but then... do they stick? Do they download > it? Do they give it a fair chance?
Hi, I for myself needed two approaches to Rebol, back in 1998, until I =20 gave it a fair chance. The first time I didn't saw the advantage of =20 Rebol as a language. I was impressed by two things: The size of the =20 interpreter and that I can do network/messaging things out-of-the-box. > So, what do you think is the #1 thing we can do to get greater =20 > stickyness? IMO we need to show what are the differences to common languages =20 (compiled and interpreted) and what advantage does this implied. This =20 will answer the "why was it done this way." And in this comparison we =20 should add code snippets to show how it looks like. --=20 Robert M. M=FCnch Management & IT Freelancer Mobile: +49 (177) 245 2802 http://www.robertmuench.de -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
