Robert M. M=FCnch wrote:
> IMO we need to show what are the differences to common languages =3D20
> (compiled and interpreted) and what advantage does this implied. This =3D=
20
> will answer the "why was it done this way." And in this comparison we =3D=
20
> should add code snippets to show how it looks like.
I agree. Some of the "features" of Rebol confuse me to no end since=20
there are other methods that seem to be easier BUT if someone can give a=20
good case as to the reasoning behind it and provide a good code snippet,=20
I'd be much less resistant to the change.
P.S. Why in the world is it that almost all of the lines end with "=3D20"=
?
Shouldn't that just be hidden? Anyway to do away with it?
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
