Even for electronic versions, I find PDF to be more readable than HTML. I'm not sure why this is: pagination? Font handling? Streamlined zooming? I dunno. It'd be nice to have an updated PDF though.
-- Brian Wisti http://coolnamehere.com/ On 9/7/05, Tom Conlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > some people (my self included with most other documentation) > really prefer a separate hard copy to reading on screen. > > that said, for searching, or viewing "small" data modules/chunks > electronic versions are equal or better. > > > On 9/7/05, Gregg Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Behi, > > > > BS> When is the PDF version of the REBOL Core document going to be > > updated? > > > > Updating the Core manual is high on the list of documentation RT wants > > done, but it may not happen until after DevCon. Even then, I'm not > > sure if the PDF format is a high priority. > > > > Is PDF important to people here? > > > > -- Gregg > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > > lists at rebol.com <http://rebol.com> <http://rebol.com> with > unsubscribe as the subject. > > > > > > > -- > ... nice weather eh > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com <http://rebol.com> with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
