Volker ~

I guess we have to agree to disagree then:

For instance, your 'attempt solution' fails at
multiple results for multiple service requests ...

[
ok [time 25-Mar-2005/12:08:12-8:00]
ok [info "Default REBOL Service"]
fail [file/put not-allowed]
fail [file/get not-exists]
]

And no, I don't believe the fix is to break the code
above down into 4 single requests and wrap them in attempts.

Besides, to me it's just plain wrong - or would you accept a
SQL client library that coughed every time it received an empty
result set from the server?

These things are not what I would consider
errors to be thrown - they are plain expectable results.

My 0.02

Kai

--

Why? if i dont miss something, thats like missing files, bad data
format etc is handled too? it throws an error, and if you dont like
it, use attempt[read something]

--

-Volker


-- 
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to 
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to