On 2/3/06, Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Graham, > > On Thursday, February 2, 2006, 12:10:01 PM, you wrote: > > GC> Isn't the dialect way forcing you to basically write a Rebol interpre= ter > GC> when you already have one?? > > Why would a *normal* synapse chat user need a REBOL interpreter? >
To set the username, the color and all such things which are not menuified or just do not work. :) Or just to show a bit rebol to the uninitiaded. Or later to do a quick complex search without need for a fully fledged dialect first (you know, every sufficiently complex program implements a lisp-interpreter, sadly even rebol-coders have to do that ;) Why is it implemented in IOS conference? > Regards, > Gabriele. > -- > Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- http://www.rebol.com/ > Colella Chiara software division --- http://www.colellachiara.com/ > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- -Volker "Any problem in computer science can be solved with another layer of indirection. But that usually will create another problem." David Wheeler -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
