7 February 1999


GST a setback to health and wealth in rural and remote communities

A Goods and Services Tax (GST) is inequitable because of its
disproportionate burden on the residents of rural and remote communities,
particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people - the poorest and
most disadvantaged sector of the Australian community.

ATSIC's Northern Territory (North) Zone Commissioner, Ms Josie Crawshaw,
said today that this is the conclusion of detailed independent studies
commissioned by ATSIC on the impact of the GST.

The studies, by Professor Owen Stanley of James Cook University and Dr David
Charles and Mr Brad Coles of the Allen Consulting Group, underpin a detailed
submission to the Senate Select Committee on a New Tax System publicly
released today by Commissioner Crawshaw on behalf of the Commission.

"ATSIC concedes that tax reform may well be overdue," she said.

"However, we have serious concerns that the GST will simply compound
disadvantage."

Commissioner Crawshaw said the tens of thousands of indigenous Australians
living in rural and remote communities faced extremely limited job
opportunities.  

"They rely on income support such as the Community Development Employment
Projects scheme, family support payments and pensions.  Fixed incomes are
often below the 1996 average wage for indigenous people of around $14 000 -
itself two-thirds the average wage in the non-indigenous community.  

"Income tax relief is largely irrelevant at these levels. 

"Our people have been running hard simply to stay in the same place - to
achieve basic survival at very poor levels of health.  The GST would see
people enter a further spiral of disadvantage as they spend more for less.  

"If the basic diet is eroded because people simply can't afford to buy
enough or better quality food, their health will further deteriorate.  In
turn, the cost of providing appropriate health services will increase."

Commissioner Crawshaw pointed out that expenditure surveys based on ready
access to mainstream supermarkets suggest around 40 per cent of household
income is spent on food. 

In Darwin, the city with the nation's highest supermarket prices, people pay
$142.83 for a food basket that costs $109.36 in Townsville.  A GST on this
basket would be $3.30 more in Darwin than in Townsville. 

In more remote locations, the cost would be much higher.  

Actual prices in community stores - usually facing no competition and
setting their own mark-ups - depended on distance from the nearest major
centre.  

Commissioner Crawshaw said remote communities sometimes payed twice the
prices charged in the cities and towns of south-eastern Australia.  The
reduction of the diesel fuel excise was likely to have a negligible effect
on transport costs because other forms, like aircraft and barges, were also
involved.

"ATSIC's submission shows that the proposed tax reform will increase
hardship on indigenous communities because it will add considerably more to
the cost of living than the 1.9 per cent calculated by the government," she
said.  

"The GST will also be counter-productive to economic development as it has
the potential to be a disincentive to business and employment and reduce the
ability of community organisations to provide services.  

"The government would need to introduce additional measures to stimulate
economic activity in those communities and increase funding to ensure that
rising costs do not mean a reduction in the level of services."

NB:  A summary of recommendations is attached.  The full ATSIC submission
and attachments are available from this site.

----
Media contacts:

Francine Chinn (NT Media Officer)       0419 819 025
Martin Freckmann                                018 631 045

Attention Radio News Editors:           

Two short audio grabs accompany this release - to access, dial 02 6262 5850
and enter access code 3000.
-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."



Reply via email to