The problem is not too much welfare without a corresponding effort on the
part of Aborigines, it is that whatever support or opportunities are
presented, nothing can overcome the feeling of rejection that is felt when
Indigenous people step out into the wider Australian community and are
slammed in the face with the overt and covert racism of most Australians.

This is why, in the United States, even though wealth flowed into Indigenous
communities through oil and mining rights, excessive drinking and drug
taking continued to be a way of life.

While the rest of the Australian community continues to benefit from the
dispossession of Aboriginal people and uses racism to isolate them ,
improvement will be at a snail's pace.

What must not be allowed to happen is for speeches such as Pearson's to be
used to absolve the wider community of responsibility for the plight of
indigenous people, which to my mind is what articles like the following
attempt to do.

It is very interesting that all these writers  are dismissive of the
importance of a Treaty in improving the conditions of Aborigines, when
almost all Indigenous leaders have emphasised the importance of a Treaty.

It looks to me as though there is an agenda on to move the debate into an
area where all attention is focused on how much Business in lieu of
Government should become involved with Aborigines, and whether or not that
will be the answer.

Once again we are being told not to listen to discordant Aboriginal voices.

Hugh Morgan replaces John Dunmore Lang---here we go again.


Laurie

Laurie and Desley Forde
Email.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Without a treaty, which spells out the obligations and rights of both
parties, there can be no Reconciliation in Australia----Geoff Clark.


--------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trudy Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "news-clip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "news-clip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 11:12 AM
Subject: SMH - Politics of the warm inner glow will not end Aboriginal
despair


> The Sydney Morning Herald
> Politics of the warm inner glow will not end Aboriginal despair
>
> Date: 25/08/2000
>
> John Howard certainly couldn't say it. Neither would Kim Beazley. Noel
Pearson could say it because he's Aboriginal and it is therefore
> much harder to accuse him of either racism or hypocrisy.
>
> But his assault on the welfare dependency of Aboriginal communities and
his comments about their "outrageous grog addiction" and the
> drug problems of their kids may make it possible for a taboo subject to be
openly addressed by all Australians.
>
> Unlike reconciliation marches or national apologies or expensive
Aboriginal art, these issues are not comfortable topics for dinner parties.
> Nor do they make for convenient finger-pointing at John Howard or his
Government, inviting targets though they may be.
>
> The more awkward reality is that modern Australia has failed the test of
how to even talk about these problems honestly, let alone to try
> to fix them. That inability to step outside the cliches doesn't come from
bad motives. Drinking too much is endemic - indeed constantly
> celebrated - in this culture and there are plenty of drug addicts at
Sydney's most elite private schools. Welfare traps are hardly confined
> to black communities.
>
> Why then pick on Aborigines for behaviour that is ubiquitous? Why risk
social death by being branded racist or no better than Pauline
> Hanson?
>
> But as Pearson points out, the scale of a problem is very different when
it comes to the disintegration of whole communities and when
> what may pass for progressive policy can actually be shown to be extremely
destructive in practice. Just as it made no sense years ago
> for complacent, white Australians to blame Aborigines as a race for most
of their social problems, it makes no sense now to blame
> inadequate government funding or even historic injustices as the only
causes for a still unfolding disaster.
>
> Perhaps it's too much to expect that we can step outside the narrow
boundaries of accepted debate even as we desperately try to flaunt
> the uniqueness of Aboriginal culture in the effort to make Australian
society more interesting to Olympic visitors.
>
> But it's not as if the deteriorating trends in Aboriginal communities are
surprising. Children of alcoholics are more like to abuse alcohol or
> drugs. Illiteracy is an extra. Petrol sniffing is just another step down a
very brutal, violent road. Combine it with no jobs and no hope and
> the dead-end destination is clear enough.
>
> Forget, though, the lure of political rhetoric or even the emotional
appeal of national reconciliation, necessary and inevitable as that may
> be.
>
> Indigenous people around the world have always been trampled in the rush
to progress. Protection will be limited at best.
>
> In the United States the presence of reservations and self-government and
treaties and mining rights and special government payments
> and Indian-run schools and colleges has not stopped the descent of many
Indian communities into devastating alcoholism and violence.
> Nothing seems to turn around the statistics. Instead, the problems among
the Indian kids on many of the larger reservations are only
> getting worse no matter what their elders try to do.
>
> In Australia, it's also evident that little of the daily catastrophe
facing Aboriginal communities would be fixed by treaties, self-government
> or formal apologies. Nor will more government money or even improved
health and education facilities be enough.
>
> Yes, it is always better to build good schools and hospitals, particularly
in remote communities. But the outback is also littered with
> examples of facilities that have been allowed to waste away through lack
of interest and commitment as much as through lack of funding.
>
> Like the welfare dependence that Pearson describes as crippling Aboriginal
communities over the past three decades, money doesn't
> easily remove a social problem and often only compounds it. As he put it
in his now famous speech, welfare should be based on the
> principle that dependence and passivity kill people and are the surest
road to social decline.
>
> Jobs and alternative forms of entertainment and the restoration of some
form of social order are basic to changing that fatal equation, of
> course. But they cannot be simply imported and developing the home-grown
variety is always difficult, frustrating and slow.
>
> What Pearson is suggesting, however, is that we've been going in the wrong
direction for so long, we've forgotten how to read the
> signposts.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This material is subject to copyright and any unauthorised use, copying or
mirroring is prohibited.
>
>
>
> *************************************************************************
> This posting is provided to the individual members of this  group without
> permission from the copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment,
> scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of the Federal
> copyright laws and it may not be distributed further without permission of
> the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to