Particularly because it works well when everything is at location C, then the connection to the outside world must be the weak link. How high of quality and bandwidth are you trying to achieve and what kind of Internet connections do you have at each location?
Salil jain wrote: > Hi, > Thanks a lot for response. Ok here is what we are using. We have one > computer which you can say at a place A and it has a camera attached > and its connected to publish a live stream on a server at location B > and we are checking at a location C (just receiving). Its only one > broadcaster and one receiver. > Though we have tested following cases and it works fine: > 1) broadcaster at C server at C and receiver at C while everything was > on different machine on local network (it works ok) > 2) broadcaster at C server at C and receiver at C while broadcaster > and server are on same machine on local network (it works good > ..better than previous case..best among all configurations) > 3) broadcaster at A server at A and receiver at C while broadcaster > and server are on same machine on local network (it works ok but worse > than 1 and 2 case) > > Geographically A and B are near and C is quite far. > I hope this helps. > Best Regards > and thanks again > Salil Jain > > > > > On 6/14/06, *Roberto Saccon* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > AFAIK, Red5 does only transport the video from red5 to client or vice > versa. So the quality only depends from the flv file you have at the > server or the webcam / mic you have at the client, unless red5 drops > frames when required bandwith exceeds porvided bandwith (not implented > yet at version 0.4.x, I think) > > On 6/14/06, Salil jain < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > We are trying to run a live feed using red5. We have installed > red5 on a > > linux box. Its running fine. But with video and audio feed we > are having a > > lot of lag. And also the video is of pretty bad quality. Are > there some > > parameters in server configuration which we can set to get > better quality? > > Looking forward for your suggestions eagerly. (also this one) > > Thanks > > > > Salil > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > -- > Roberto Saccon > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Red5 mailing list >[email protected] >http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
