I am lost in the long mail chain about the up-coming FlashPlayer. Is anyone here can make a summary about what is happening in this version? What are the restrictions and impacts on the server side? Thanks.
On 8/22/07, Nikolay Botev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The short answer: Yes, you've got this wrong. > > Based on the information available at this point, Sorenson Spark, VP6 and > Nellymoser Audio will still be supported as explained on Tunic's blog and > confirmed here by an earlier post by Dominick (re. Sorenson). > > -Nikolay > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Tabitha Flash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:44:48 PM > Subject: [Red5] The New Flash Player > > Hi, > > While I believe the name Red5 is of no relevence to its future success, I > am worried that this recently announced release of the flash player will not > support old video (and possibly audio) codecs and that any future > server delivery of audio and video will have to come from FMS. I.e. The > player will not support the existing codecs for live, pre recorded or any > type of stream. FMS will convert everything and Red5 and the like will not > work unless they can transcode on the fly. Video conferencing for example > will not work using Red5. > > Have I got this wrong? I hope so! > > Tabby > > *Walter Tak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote: > > How about Yellow6 or Green4 ? > > I mean ; who cares about a name. It isn't worth much since it's mostly > known to developers and those don't care if the project is called XX73262, > purple31337 or none.com. > > The zillion blogs that would write about a forced renaming of Red5 to XXXX > would be high in the ranks of G00gle so ppl searching for Red5 after the > namechange would > end up on the new domainname in seconds. > > IF however Red5 is violating anything, be it reverse engineering, which > seems to be illegal in several countries then this project is at risk, right > ? > > I'd like to hear some of the (other) developers views on this case since > we're heavily investing in Red5-technology and we > wouldn't like to hear that the product would be declared 'illegal' in the > near future. > > Regards, > Walter > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:16 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Red5] H.264 codec on Flash player... but not for Red5? > > 1. I am not clear what name you are saying red5 comes close to infringing. > > 2. If it does, there are no damages without notice. You cannot sue if you > ask someone to change the name and they do. Its not like copyright > infringement where any infringement creates a statutory liability. Therefore > any intelligent open source project would just change its name. This would > not be a smart strategy for eliminating open source and I *strongly* doubt > red5 is at any risk from this kind of a plan. > > Regards, > Hank > > > > > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. > It has removed 10775 spam emails to date. > Paying users do not have this message in their emails. > Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len> for free now! > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > ------------------------------ > For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For > Good<http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html>this month. > > > ------------------------------ > Pinpoint customers > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48250/*http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v9.php?o=US2226&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=AprNI&s=Y&s2=EM&b=50>who > are looking for what you sell. > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > -- Best Regards Steven Gong InfraRed5 Red5 Consultant: http://www.infrared5.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Red5 Developer: http://osflash.org/red5, http://jira.red5.org/confluence/display/~steven/Home Modesty is an overrated quality in men of no great accomplishment. -- Ricky Jay
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
