The short answer: Yes, you've got this wrong.
Based on the information available at this point, Sorenson Spark, VP6 and
Nellymoser Audio will still be supported as explained on Tunic's blog and
confirmed here by an earlier post by Dominick (re. Sorenson).
-Nikolay
----- Original Message ----
From: Tabitha Flash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:44:48 PM
Subject: [Red5] The New Flash Player
Hi,
While I believe the name Red5 is of no relevence to its future success, I am
worried that this recently announced release of the flash player will not
support old video (and possibly audio) codecs and that any future server
delivery of audio and video will have to come from FMS. I.e. The player will
not support the existing codecs for live, pre recorded or any type of stream.
FMS will convert everything and Red5 and the like will not work unless they can
transcode on the fly. Video conferencing for example will not work using Red5.
Have I got this wrong? I hope so!
Tabby
Walter Tak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about Yellow6 or Green4 ?
I mean ; who cares about a name. It isn't worth much since it's mostly known
to developers and those don't care if the project is called XX73262,
purple31337 or none.com.
The zillion blogs that would write about a forced renaming of Red5 to XXXX
would be high in the ranks of G00gle so ppl searching for Red5 after the
namechange would
end up on the new domainname in seconds.
IF however Red5 is violating anything, be it reverse engineering, which seems
to be illegal in several countries then this project is at risk, right ?
I'd like to hear some of the (other) developers views on this case since
we're heavily investing in Red5-technology and we
wouldn't like to hear that the product would be declared 'illegal' in the near
future.
Regards,
Walter
----- Original Message -----
From: hank williams
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Red5] H.264 codec on Flash player... but not for Red5?
1. I am not clear what name you are saying red5 comes close to infringing.
2. If it does, there are no damages without notice. You cannot sue if you ask
someone to change the name and they do. Its not like copyright infringement
where any infringement creates a statutory liability. Therefore any intelligent
open source project would just change its name. This would not be a smart
strategy for eliminating open source and I *strongly* doubt red5 is at any risk
from this kind of a plan.
Regards,
Hank
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private
users.
It has removed 10775 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this month.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
