yes you did,
Adobe cares too much about backward compatibility so they won't never
discontinue current codecs. Also, for your information, sorenson
will be the only codec available for encoding from within Flash Player
and they don't plan to add On2 or h.264 codecs. You will be able to
encode in those formats with 3rd party tools or with FMEncoder but not
within Flash Player or AIR.
They are adding new functionality, not replacing old by new.
João Fernandes
Tabitha Flash wrote:
Hi,
While I believe the name Red5 is of no relevence to its future
success, I am worried that this recently announced release of the
flash player will not support old video (and possibly audio) codecs
and that any future server delivery of audio and video will have to
come from FMS. I.e. The player will not support the existing codecs
for live, pre recorded or any type of stream. FMS will convert
everything and Red5 and the like will not work unless they can
transcode on the fly. Video conferencing for example will not work
using Red5.
Have I got this wrong? I hope so!
Tabby
*/Walter Tak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
How about Yellow6 or Green4 ?
I mean ; who cares about a name. It isn't worth much since it's
mostly known to developers and those don't care if the project is
called XX73262, purple31337 or none.com.
The zillion blogs that would write about a forced renaming of Red5
to XXXX would be high in the ranks of G00gle so ppl searching for
Red5 after the namechange would
end up on the new domainname in seconds.
IF however Red5 is violating anything, be it reverse engineering,
which seems to be illegal in several countries then this project
is at risk, right ?
I'd like to hear some of the (other) developers views on this case
since we're heavily investing in Red5-technology and we
wouldn't like to hear that the product would be declared 'illegal'
in the near future.
Regards,
Walter
----- Original Message -----
*From:* hank williams <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2007 12:16 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Red5] H.264 codec on Flash player... but not
for Red5?
1. I am not clear what name you are saying red5 comes close to
infringing.
2. If it does, there are no damages without notice. You cannot
sue if you ask someone to change the name and they do. Its not
like copyright infringement where any infringement creates a
statutory liability. Therefore any intelligent open source
project would just change its name. This would not be a smart
strategy for eliminating open source and I *strongly* doubt
red5 is at any risk from this kind of a plan.
Regards,
Hank
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 10775 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len> for free now!
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good
<http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html> this month.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
