Hi Tony, In your code below where does the stf which does not work is not showing in the second line or in your bypassing process? <p>stf_thatWorks: <%stf_thatWorks%></p>
< p>stf_doesntWork: <%stf_doesntWork%></p> < h2>Attempt to bypass preprocessing</h2> < p>stf_doesntWork: <%= "<" & "%" & """ & <%stf_doesntWork%> & """ & "%" & ">" %> I am not clear you said that you dont have any value in stf? Check if there is content via edit form for the stf whcih is not working. Also check the stf which is working has any default value set to your URL. Thanks, Shankar On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Tony Chung <to...@tonychung.ca> wrote: > Hi Shankar, > > I added both stf to the content body and only the one set up by the > implementers displays in preview. The new one I created does not. > > I even tried bypassing the preprocess routines by wrapping the code as > an output. But I guess if there isn't a value in the stf then it > wouldn't work anyway. > > <p>stf_thatWorks: <%stf_thatWorks%></p> > > <p>stf_doesntWork: <%stf_doesntWork%></p> > > <h2>Attempt to bypass preprocessing</h2> > <p>stf_doesntWork: <%= "<" & "%" & """ & <%stf_doesntWork%> & """ & "%" & > ">" %> > > Thanks, > > -Tony > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, shanson <shanson...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That will be nice, check first if you see both stf values in Preview > mode. I > > got it what you are looking for. Let me know if it still doesn't publish. > > > > Thanks, > > Shankar > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tony Chung <to...@tonychung.ca> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks Shankar, > >> > >> One of the stf values set up by our implementer appears in the web page > >> HTML but the new stf I set up prints empty. > >> > >> I'll set up a test to display the content of both stf in preview mode > >> tomorrow. > >> > >> Essentially I am trying to get the URL of the HOST_NAME server value. > Our > >> server is set up weirdly where only a few Request.ServerVariables are > >> available, and HOST_NAME is set to "localhost". So I have to resort to > using > >> the field we set up te published URL instead. > >> > >> -Tony > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thursday, September 20, 2012, shanson wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Tony, > >>> > >>> Its not clear what you mean by gets publish to the DS pages, do you > mean > >>> that you see this on web pages or to one of the page attribute on DS > server? > >>> If it is page attribute then can you check if your current standard > field is > >>> set within the import dynaments inside your templates, If it is not as > a > >>> attribute then can you check if the content appears if you publish > this on > >>> IIS server. Do you see this standard field content in Preview mode? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Shankar Sonawane > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tony Chung <to...@tonychung.ca> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I'm modifying several templates and experienced an odd problem with > >>>> standard fields. These standard fields are presently set in the > project > >>>> root, and are used to set the server parameters once. Standard fields > are > >>>> used our templates as references to the root elements. > >>>> > >>>> One standard field was set up by our implementer, and it works fine to > >>>> publish the text value to the delivery server pages. > >>>> > >>>> I created a new standard field based on the settings of the working > >>>> standard field and referenced the new element value. This standard > field > >>>> does not output to the delivery server pages. > >>>> > >>>> Both Standard fields are of type Standard Field, and the Text option > is > >>>> selected. > >>>> > >>>> What do I need to know to get standard fields working? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> -Tony > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. > >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reddot-cms-users/-/_poCW1bXDIsJ. > >>>> To post to this group, send email to > reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com. > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en. > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >>> "RedDot CMS Users" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com > . > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en. > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "RedDot CMS Users" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "RedDot CMS Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RedDot CMS Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.