|
Date:
|
Apr 20 2000 15:09:55 EDT
|
|
From:
|
nilton tobita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|
Subject:
|
Re: [redewan] Rotas est�ticas |
Oi Liarth,
Os dois modos funcionam a unica diferenca e' que
quando voce usa "serial X" ao inves de um endereco IP,
e' que no primeiro caso a "distancia administrativa"
e' menor (valor 0) e no segundo caso por default e' 1.
Se voce tivesse os dois casos ao mesmo tempo a menor
distancia prevalece, ou seja, o pacote iria para a
interface assinalada como "serial".
Se os dois tiverem o mesma distancia, o roteador fara
load balance entre os links.
Abracos.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lista de Discuss�o Rede Wan -
> http://www.networkdesigners.com.br
>
>
>
> Estou com uma d�vida qual a diferen�a entre se
> colocar rotas est�ticas nos
> roteadores cisco da maneira do router A, ou inv�s a
> do router B.
> Router A
> interface Serial0
> ip address 172.17.50.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation ppp
> bandwidth 19200
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 172.17.51.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation ppp
> bandwidth 19200
>
> ip route 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.17.50.2
> ip route 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.17.51.2
> ip route 10.255.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.17.50.2
> ip route 10.255.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.17.51.2
>
>
> Router B
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 172.17.50.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation ppp
> bandwidth 19200
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 172.17.51.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation ppp
> bandwidth 19200
>
> ip route 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 serial 0
> ip route 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 serial 1
> ip route 10.255.0.0 255.255.0.0 serial 0
> ip route 10.255.0.0 255.255.0.0 serial 1
>
> Abra�os
>
>
> Roberto Liarth
> Tec. Inform�tica Pleno
> Telefonica Celular
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
>
=====
Nilton Tobita
CCIE #3506
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com
|
