H. Peter Anvin writes: > Either way, rc.local should be for *local* stuff. Just like /usr/local, > it should be *empty*. I suppose the code that makes an issue file with the Red hat release and kernel version could go in a script under /etc/rc.d/init.d, perhaps called makeissue, and that script could go in the initscripts or redhat-release package. Then if someone wants to customize /etc/issue, they can either create their own issue file (by hand) and turn off makeissue with something like ntsysv, or they could add code in /etc/rc.d/rc.local that changes, adds to, or overwrites the issue file. Matt -- Matt Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web site: http://www.crosswinds.net/~mattcamp/ ICQ #: 33005941 -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- console color code location? Al Elia
- Re: console color code location? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code location? Kevin Waterson
- Re: console color code location? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code location? Bill Nottingham
- Re: console color code location? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code location... Bill Nottingham
- Re: console color code loca... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code loca... Matthew Campbell
- Re: console color code loca... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code loca... John Summerfield
- Re: console color code loca... R P Herrold
- mandated charceters in user... Kevin Waterson
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Ray Atnip
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Kevin Waterson
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Alan Shutko
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Chris Garrigues
- Re: mandated charceters in ... John Summerfield
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Kevin Waterson