"James M. Rogers" wrote:
> 
> Probably not,
> 
>   This would probably still violate some sort of patent that RSA has covering
> public key encrytion.  Probably best to avoid for now til the RSA patent
> expires and some other companies successfully win a court case against RSA.
> Also it would make it difficult to export out of the US,  you know how the
> government feels about those foreigners having any sort of strong
> encryption...  Not that they aren't smart enough to figure out strong
> encryption on their own... ;)
> 

The generic public key encryption patent has already expired.  That's
why gpg uses DSS/Diffie-Hellman, it's completely patent free.  The
actual RSA patent (which is valid only inside the US) expires next year.

        -hpa

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Reply via email to