Jeremy Katz wrote:

> [ Monday, January 31 2000 ] had Kevin Waterson saying:
>
> > Why is bash2 not the default for rh 6.1
> > Is there plans to implement this at a further date
>
> Past questions regarding this have come to the conclusion that bash2 is
> incompatible in several ways with bash 1.14, and that it would tend to
> break some people's scripts.  Therefore, bash is bash 1.14, and bash2 is
> bash2.

My understanding was that bash2 was fully backwards compatable.
I could however be mildly/wildly mistaken

Kind regards
Kevin



-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Reply via email to