Tony Nugent wrote: > On Mon Jan 31 2000 at 11:43, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > My understanding was that bash2 was fully backwards compatable. I > > > could however be mildly/wildly mistaken > > > > It is mostly but not 100%. The breakages are actually not so much a > > bash fault either. bash2 is more strictly compliant and this bites > > some scripts > > But honestly, is there any *real* reason to stick with bash v1.14.x ? > > Let the old #!/bin/bash scripts break -- they need to be fixed. > > The sooner "echo $BASH_VERSION" returns 2.x by default, the better... perhaps a simple bash2 script to update bash1 scripts? Kevin -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
