Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> >
> > Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > but (as always) I prefer freedom and the chance for choice. that's what
> > > I realy request from rh (and waiting for it). if there is more jurnaling fs
> > > than give _me_ the chance to choice.
> >
> > Sure, when they're ready.
>
> what is ready ? kernel-2.4 was ready at the time of 7.0 ?
No, and we didn't ship it as part of it either (we had a preview for
people wanting to try it on their own, but this was in no way
integrated with the rest)
> when it is requested by many (ok what does it mean "many") people that
> put it into (at least) preview.
I don't think we'll disable it unless some really good reason shows
up...
> > They conflict, which isn't acceptable for the core components. Thus,
> > postfix stays in Powertools FTTB.
>
> what does it mean conflict ? that I can't install both ?
Yes.
> suppose those who wanna choose postfix knows what the purpose of
> it.
Way too many use "everything" - anyway, it's a policy not to have such
conflicts in the main. Everything can be installed at once, if you
really want to.
> anyway when I wrote "support" I mean just "think about it"
> i.e. when I request postfix and qmail "support"
Qmail is not an option, see the licensing.
> what I'd like to see, that if I already have an installed mta (not
> all just "suppoted") than the next distro's updater do _not_ install
> sendmail which overwrites eg /usr/sbin/sendmail.
Does this(sendmail upgrades postfix) happen? Bugzilla?
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
