> > On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote: > > The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did > > look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment > > (i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS > > mount, but again I wonder how it would perform. Must read some more, and > > test. > > AFAIK you can have UML's boot off nfs. They also have a uml-fs which > allows the uml to directly mount the host filesystem, though there are > permissions/ownership issues. > One important thing for us is being able to use a kernel that supports Rational ClearCase's mvfs. They would not have done that would they?
_______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
