Em Seg 02 Dez 2002 21:57, Peter Bowen escreveu: > On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:02, Carlos wrote: > > Why did you use dietlibc? Why did you not use glibc ? > > dietlibc, as the name suggests, is a lightweight libc. It generates > noticibly smaller static executables that those linked against glibc. > This is important for anaconda as space is at a premium on the boot > floppies. > > Thanks. > Peter
May I compile the sources using normal glibc instead of dietlibc ? Thanks _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
