On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> Em Seg 02 Dez 2002 21:57, Peter Bowen escreveu:
> > On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:02, Carlos wrote:
> > > Why did you use dietlibc? Why did you not use glibc ?
> >
> > dietlibc, as the name suggests, is a lightweight libc. It generates
> > noticibly smaller static executables that those linked against glibc.
> > This is important for anaconda as space is at a premium on the boot
> > floppies.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Peter
>
> May I compile the sources using normal glibc instead of dietlibc ?
If you remove all the dietlibc-stuff from the build process it *should*
build and run ok as such (not that I've tested) but it will NOT fit on the
boot floppies!
--
- Panu -
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
