The only way that I could see Win95 doing this, is if you were to use
loadlin out of Win95 and boot from Win95 itself....(which you can do
believe it or not....nice little program :)   )

----------
> From: Lawrence Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Trio64V2/DX started failing with XDM under 3.3.2!
> Date: Monday, June 15, 1998 3:48 PM
> 
> Red Hat USERS:
> 
> On Sun, 14 Jun 1998, Lawrence Houston wrote:
> > This week I upgraded a RH 4.2 Installtion with Red Hat's recommended
> > XFree86 3.3.2-1 for Intel and now XDM is failing to start with
Systems's
> > "onboard" S3 Trio64V2/DX.  The Trio64V2/DX had been working with S3
Server
> > included in 3.3.1 (I understood the V2 variety of the Trio64 had been
> > unsupported with the XFree86 3.2 included in RH 4.2 the Distribution)! 
> > Symptoms: VTs 1-7 (including the one for the X-11 Server) are filled
with
> > virtical lines of junk and the XDM Log reports: 
> > 
> >    xdm error (pid 280): Hung in XOpenDisplay(:0), aborting
> >    xdm error (pid 280): server open failed for :0, giving up
> >    xdm error (pid 275): Display :0 cannot be opened
> > 
> > Found XFree86 3.3.1-1.2 on an FTP Site in Japan (all the Mirrors I
tried
> > and my own copies had overwritten with 3.3.2-1) and the Trio64V2/DX
> > appears to "happy" starting XDM at boot time (AGAIN)?
> > 
> > Might there a "bug" in XFree86 3.3.2's X3 support for the Trio64V2/DX
> > Chipset, or is there something "new" in the mix since this version was
> > built under 2.0.34 and is now being wrapped with "Xwrapper" instead of
> > "xserver-wrapper".  I am NOT comfortable moving away from 3.3.2 since
it
> > addressed some Security Issues, but 3.3.1 is the presently the ONLY way
> > this baby will "fly"! 
> 
> Following up to my own post:
> 
> My original observations were NOT entirely accurate, downgrading XFree86
> had NOT cleared the problem with XDM failing to start at boot time. 
> Whether using XFree86 3.3.1 or 3.3.2 the S3 Server would get "stuck"
> during the initialization process, pulling just under 100% of the CPU's
> Time (a "slower" Linux still being available for remote sessions)!  The
> XDM Error Messages would NOT always be recorded, although CPU getting
> "stuck" at 100% happened in all cases. 
> 
> The computer in question is a 200MMX HP Vectra which dual boots between
> WIN95 OSR2 and RH 4.2.  Although this "problem" appeared within days of
> the XFree86 3.3.2 Security Upgrade being applied, presently it looks like
> a warm boot from WIN95 to RH 4.2 might have left the Trio64V2/DX in a
> state XFree86's S3 Server could NOT initialize!  Unfortunately these HP
> Vectras have NO Reset Button, hence the ONLY way to get a non-warm reboot
> is to cycle the power.  After which RH 4.2 with the XFree86 3.3.1 and
> 3.3.2 S3 Servers started correctly (and run without hogging the CPU). 
> 
> Might the WIN95 OSR2 Driver (or possibly Starnet's V4.0 X-WIN32 Server) 
> have left the Trio64V2/DX Chipset in a state which the XFree86's S3
Server
> could NOT handle and looped endlessly attempting to do so?  I've had
> similar problems with my SB16 Sound Card, on occasion failing to be
> detected when Linux is warm booted from a Windows 3.X/95 Session (cold
> boot or reset are often requried)! 
> 
> Lawrence Houston  -  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> 
> -- 
>   PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
/mailing-lists
>          To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> 


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to