On 7 May 1998, Bryan C. Andregg wrote: > On Thu, 7 May 1998 15:46:31 -0500 (CDT), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know the reason that redhat doesn't (or any distro for that matter) > > include qmail is because it has to be in source, but why doesn't redhat [... more of the same.. ] > Not all machines wish to install development utilities or have the > space/resources to do so What?? Is someone calling qmail a developement utility? I've probably got it wrong (and I hope so), but anyone calling qmail a development utility is likely to be ripped to pieces. Because it's fast, secure, and works for months on end flawlessly under heavy load. Unlike sendmail. etc. Chris -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.