On 8 May, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> On 7 May 1998, Bryan C. Andregg wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 7 May 1998 15:46:31 -0500 (CDT), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I know the reason that redhat doesn't (or any distro for that matter)
>> > include qmail is because it has to be in source, but why doesn't redhat
>
> [... more of the same.. ]
>
>> Not all machines wish to install development utilities or have the
>> space/resources to do so
>
> What?? Is someone calling qmail a developement utility?
>
> I've probably got it wrong (and I hope so), but anyone calling qmail a
> development utility is likely to be ripped to pieces. Because it's fast,
> secure, and works for months on end flawlessly under heavy load. Unlike
> sendmail. etc.
NO - but the suggestion to which Bryan was replying was that Red Hat
offer a source rpm of qmail. Then if the user wanted qmail, choosing
that option would install the source rpm, COMPILE it...
Hence the need for development stuff...
--
Robert Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat Software Inc. Phone: +1-919-547-0012 Fax: +1-919-547-0024
4201 Research Commons Suite 100, 79 TW Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park,
NC 27709, USA
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
