i finally took a couple of hours and perused last fall's
first draft of the U.S. government's "national strategy to
secure cyberspace".  (reportedly, AP has already obtained
a pre-publication version of the second draft, which has been
apparently gutted of anything useful).

  this doc is available at www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb but,
to save you the time, it is a thoroughly worthless piece
of work, laden with inventive acronyms and fawning over
what kind of utter visionary president bush is.  but i
digress.  onwards.

  in the wake of the recent MS sql server virus, i was
curious to see if that document would make even a passing
reference to either of the notions that:

1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely
  responsible for the insecurity of the current IT
  infrastructure, or

2) open source software at least represents an *option*
  for trying to secure cyberspace.

good luck.  after wading through pages of tortuous
intro, the first major section discusses security for
the home user and small business person, offering such
stunning enlightenment as "Use a Tough Password."

point 4, on "filtering", talks about how parents should
take care to filter internet content for their kids, an
issue having nothing whatever to do with cybersecurity,
but which gives the authors the chance to do a little 
family values moralizing.

the table of recommendations in the AGENDA however, is
where the fun starts.  this is, AFAICT, the *only* place
in the entire document that refers to Microsoft by name,
where point R1-4 reads, 

  "Home users should also regularly update their personal
 computer's operating systems (such as Microsoft Windows,
 Linux) and major applications ..."

  yup, you read it right -- according to the president's
own cybersecurity council, linux is an official desktop
OS.  mind you, given that ex-microsoftie howard schmidt
is vice chair of this group, is it any mystery that he
would try to tar linux by association, implying that it
is just as insecure and bug-riddled as windows?

  and, AFAICT, there is not a single reference to the
potential use of OSS *anywhere* in the document.  

  your (american) tax dollars at work.

rday

--

Robert P. J. Day, RHCE
Eno River Technologies, Inc.
Unix, Linux and Open Source training
  Chapel Hill, NC
  Waterloo, ON

http://www.linux-migration.org



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to