Not quite true, Jonathan. Outlook 2000 could not decode your signature, here, although it did recognize it as being validly signed. It also refused to open your messages in a preview pane.
Bill Ward (YAUFTUMOAW - Yet another user forced to use Microsoft Outlook at work... even though I have four Linux boxes, one Solaris box, and an Irix box within 3 feet of me, and three on or under my desk itself). > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan M. Slivko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OT] Attention Jonathan M.Slivko > > > Polar, > > No, I encrypted my *signature*, not the e-mail itself. > Apparently, any Outlook > mail client is able to read that, but the GNU mail clients > cannot for some > reason. I have fixed that and all should be working now. > > -- Jonathan > > Quoting Polar Humenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: > > > > > I appeared to have misconfigued Outlook to encrypt mail > too, I have set it > > to > > > send as clear-text, hopefully that should clear it up. > > > > My question is if you configured Outlook to encrypt mail, > for specifically > > who did it encrypt the mail when you hit the send button? > Don't you have > > to have certificates and keys for the recepient? Does the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] have a key somewhere? > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
