-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:41:12 -0500 (EST), Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Me wrote:
                       ^^
                       not!

> > Okay, this really isn't a problem.  It's just an annoyance.
> > 
> > I had the hardest time installing a custom built kernel on my Redhat 8.0
> > box.  After some research I found the culprit to be ext3.  It seems that
> > ext3 support HAS to be built as a module and not be built directly into
> > the kernel.
> 
> not true.
> 
> > It also seems that you MUST use a RAM disk to load the ext3
> > module.  That was the only way I could get it to work.
> 
> also not true.  what kind of errors were you getting?  *note*
> that, as i recall, there was an issue regarding whether or not
> you could use "LABEL=" entries in /etc/fstab when using ext3.
> i can't remember the exact issue -- can anyone clarify this?

When I build ext3 not as a module (CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y, CONFIG_JBD=y),
I can boot the kernel fine without a RAM-disk. "LABEL=" has never
worked for me in GRUB boot menu. But it works in fstab in both
cases. Whether or not ext3 is a module, doesn't have an influence on
partition labels.

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+bK5j0iMVcrivHFQRAhWFAJ9PLoSFlVd6XSzw0btOfO2cJq+8kACcD4jp
nch9+mYm9WKVJaQo4VRM5+E=
=AN8Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to