Word to business sense
Cheers to Linux stability:
2:17pm  up 189 days, 14:42, 1 user,  load average: 0.31, 0.23, 0.21
Jeers to Windows reboots for almost every "Windows Update"
Today's 331953 Security Update made me reboot a server :(

/B

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neumann, Shannon M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 08:03
Subject: RE: Linux vs Windows


> Oh, my...  Flame war here we come.  My question is that if you are such
> an "advit" (do you mean avid) Windows user, then what are you doing on
> this list in the first place?  Don't get me wrong, I am not a "Windows
> Sucks" person.  My primary workstations are running XP.  Having said
> that, I use linux wherever it makes sense, like on my
> web/email/dns/dhcp/samba servers.  It's not about affordability, it's
> about what makes the best business sense.  I can shell out thousands for
> Windows2000 server licensing (plus a box that is sufficiently powerful),
> or I can download the Redhat ISO's and pay a nominal fee for priority
> updates (a fee that isn't required, I might add).  For me, it just makes
> sense to use an OS on my servers that is stable, relatively secure, and
> basically free.
> 
> The most important point I want to make is that the purpose of these
> lists is for people to gain information and to learn from others who
> have been through the same stuff before.  It is not (and should not) be
> a forum for the ignorant to display to the mass public just how ignorant
> they really are.
> 
> S
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: brent nicholls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
> 
> 
> Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I installed windows and
> i 
> only had to reboot once, and you dont have to reboot after changing your
> 
> screen rez you newb you set it up so it applys the settings with out 
> rebooting, if you dont like windows than you should go with the open
> source 
> joke called linux. I am a advit windows user and will be for the rest of
> my 
> life. No matter what you say you put a sound, network card, and video
> card 
> in xp turn on your xp box and it finds all the drivers for you and you
> dont 
> need to reboot, (found new hardwared, ten seconds go by, your new
> hardware 
> is ready to use) now where did you reboot in that case goof.
> 
> The only reason why you knock windows is because it is the domoninat 
> operating system and you just cant afford it. So take your no job ass
> and go 
> and download Linux and go on a fake windows box...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
> >Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:38:42 -0500 (EST)
> >
> >Ever try installing Windows XP on a computer that is not bottable from 
> >CD?
> >
> >You need no less than 6 floppies.  AND, Windows doesn't check to see if
> 
> >your system meets minimum specs until the last floppy.  AND, I couldn't
> 
> >find the program to make the floppies anywhere on the CD.  I had to go 
> >out to MS's web site to get it...  No fun.
> >
> > > On Wednesday 26 March 2003 02:03 pm, Cliff Wells wrote:
> > >
> > > I am going to agree with you to disagree with any argument that 
> > > Windows is  easier to install...
> > >
> > > My last experience installing Windows is just a frustrating attempt.
> 
> > > Try to  count how many times a Win machine has to reboot after 
> > > install before you can  use it... "found a new hardware.. video 
> > > card" -- reboot after installing driver before  win can use it
> > > "found a new hardware.. sound card" -- reboot
> > > "found a new hardware.. plug and play monitor" -- reboot
> > > "found a new hardware..  network card" -- reboot
> > >
> > > and then..
> > > "change display resolution" -- reboot
> > > "install a program" -- reboot
> > >
> > > WTH??
> > > .......
> > >
> > > and try install linux. Reboot *once* after install and that's it.
> > >
> > > IE has better support for CSS? Where do you hear that from??? 
> > > Mozilla support  for *standard* HTML and CSS is far better than IE, 
> > > no question about that.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >redhat-list mailing list
> >unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to