On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:24:55PM -0500, Jeff Kinz wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:08:13PM +0200, T. Ribbrock wrote: [...] > > good releases, some even excellent at the time). The fact that RH is > > keeping quiet about their intentions in this regard doesn't help, > > either - and it certainly doesn't help *them*, as they might > > potentially loose customers. > > > REDHAT has definitely NOT been keeping quiet about their intentions regarding > the RH 9 and RHAS release.
They have been keeping quiet as far as "tangible evidence" goes, i.e. statements on e.g. the web site or here in the forums. [...] > RHAS is the "Stable" release track. Customers like Oracle etc.. need a > product they can certify their products with and support their products > on for their customers. RH's 7.Z, 8.0 etc... release cycle was too fast > for comapnies like Oracle and others so the AS product line was the answer > for the corporate enterprise customer. > > Also made clear was that the RH <N> releases, (the "integer" releases), > would not be receiving the same level of effort as AS to assure that the > integer releases are stable enterprise level production environments. If what you're saying is the official RH line (are there any pointers to it?), then I stand by my statement that less stability for the "ordinary" releases is at least probable. Cheerio, Thomas -- ==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1&w=2 <== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Ribbrock http://www.ribbrock.org "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
