Terry,
If you need stable releases to develop against, I suggest you look at developing for RedHat Enterprise Linux Advanced Server. They have made this version to be a stable platform with a longer development cycle for this very purpose. RedHat has done a good job in making the distinction between the two product lines (in my opinion). The redistributable release is going to be bleeding edge and probably a test-bed for functions and features that will find their way into the EL line of products once they become stable.
Just my thoughts.
Brad Sites
Systems Administrator
Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Barnaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat 9 not 9.0 ?
Hi,
There is obviously a trade off between compatibility and progress.
I am one that thought the RedHat tradeoff level was about right.
There was always the Redhat Raw Hide for more radical developments.
As an application developer we have got used to supporting
applications on RedHat with releases such as 7.0, 7.1, 7.2.
One of the major problems with Linux (we have been using/supporting
Linux for many years) is the frequent changing of basic binary
compatibility. This is a nightmare to us application developers.
The past RedHat distributions, being based on an around yearly major
update with a major version number change to signify this suited us
quite well, helping us cope with Lunux evolution. We always stayed
clear of x.0 releases as we needed stability over new features.
May I ask:
1. Why was this change to a system of releases, that appeared to
be working well, made ?
2. Did RedHat talk over this issue with customers and other Linux
users prior to changing ? This seems to have come out of
the blue ...
3. Is there information, on the RedHat website, as to RedHat's new
version policy ?
4. I presume that RedHat 9 will not conform to the "Linux Standard Base" ?
5. Is this change there to force all RedHat Linux users, both business
and home, that need a platform that its stable and productive
to purchase one of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux packages ?
One of the reasons we use and support RedHat is due to the consistent
and stable nature of the releases. If this is going to change we, and
I suspect others, will need to rethink which distribution to use and
support ...
It may be that RedHat is no longer interested in non enterprise users.
If so this would, I believe, be a mistake. Linux and RedHat has been
built with the expertise and testing of the huge number of non-enterprise
users. If those users/developers move to another Linux distribution RedHat
will lose a great deal ...
It is essential for any company to communicate well with its customers,
especially if a major change to the product line is going to be made,
if not customers will become confused, disillusioned and disappear ....
Terry
Eric Wood wrote:
> I think that's good! We've catered to ancient programs for too long via
> compatibility. It's time to see what software package will have a pulse.
> It's time to see what dies and what is born.
> -eric wood
>
>
> From: "Jeff Bearer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>Keep in mind that the consumer RHL is going to be a lot more aggressive
>>with new stuff, so they may in fact break binary compatibility on each
>>release.
>
>
>
>
--
Dr Terry Barnaby BEAM Ltd
Phone: +44 1454 324512 Northavon Business Center, Dean Rd
Fax: +44 1454 313172 Yate, Bristol, BS37 5NH, UK
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.beam.ltd.uk
BEAM for: Visually Impaired X-Terminals, Parallel Processing, Software
"Tandems are twice the fun !"
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
