On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, fred smith wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:05:08PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > > > > Just to clarify it (I've never used up2date): You *do* need a RHN > > > subscription for up2date, right? Are there mirrors? > > > > You need an "account". You *do not* need a subscription. > > > > If you have a subscription you will not get rejected during periods of > > high usage. > > Yes, I know. I've been updating this system via up2date for a couple
My response was directed at T. Ribbrock....who seems like he didn't know. > of years. Suddenly 3-5 days go by when even a ten-minute polling > interval won't get me in. So I was just asking if others have seen > it being unusually busy this week, or what. If you are using an "account" and not a "subscription" then you and others are seeing what you have reported due to the demand on the RHN servers related to downloading of Red Hat 9. > I suppose I could shorten the interval, but I'm trying to be a > good citizen, not a resource hog. Or spend the $60 and help Red Hat. Maybe they should turn the hat upside down in the webpages for subscriptions. :-) Ed -- http://webcams.greshko.com/ Do you know this man, Peter Boeni? http://www.shorewall.net/ for all your firewall needs -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
