Finally, depleted uranium ammunition is *not* a "weapon of mass destruction."
Very true. Unless one considers a four-man tank crew a "mass" which I don't. ;)
It is quite a conventional weapon, but made of unconventional, if imaginative, material.
I guess a very relevant point to the original .sig's validity is, what is the remaining radioactivity level in a depleted uranium slug and how much uranium is actually in there? I have no idea, and really don't even care, but the answers could matter to the guy's point of view.
-- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
