On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 18:10:06 -0600 "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean Estabrooks wrote: > > >However, i was trying to make the point strongly that the poster should > >not believe anything he posts on the web can be protected with some silly > >scheme. > > > > > I'm well aware of what can, and can't be protected on the web. My > quest is to avoid hot linking, and to avoid someone from directly > hitting an image. I'm not after preventing someone from stealing my > images - for that, I just don't put them online. > > Furthermore, you assume everyone on the net is some l33t h4x0r like > you, to know how to bypass whatever they encounter that's preventing > them from looking at something. You assume no one has a life like you > to go round and about with what your suggesting. Again, I'm not out to > stop someone from doing it. I'm merely trying to slow them down. I'm > perfectly happy if they load up the actual page containing the image. I > don't like however, if they just go straight to the image and look at > it, or worse link it somewhere for their pleasure. > > Get off your high horse. > Thanks for your thoughtful reply however i'm not riding a horse or assuming much. Obviously what i did assume was that anyone who would ask such a basic question needed to be cautioned. Hope you're site is a big success, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
