-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:22:30 -0400, Rik Thomas wrote:
> > Seriously, every time I post a message to this list I get two emails > > back that my mail was rejected by Sturman Industries because of an > > executable file attachment which in turn our server bounces back. > > > > The "executable" is a PGP signature which is enabled by default. > > > > No big deal. It's just a little more noise. I must remind myself of FIDO > > 102 - "not to be easily annoyed." (101 was "not to excessively annoy > > others"). > > Since we are being pedantic... > > And it is also considered bad form to digitally sign a post to a mailing > list. Please refrain from doing so, all attachments to mailing lists > for that matter are bad form. The first time I hear that. PGP/MIME or cleartext signatures are common practice, especially among people who are sick of receiving complaints in private mail after some spammer or idiot has abused a valid e-mail address again and sent junk/virus to lists or individuals. By signing messages automatically I want to make sure that recipients, who only know me from mailing-lists, are sceptical when they receive an unsigned message with my address/name in the headers. That seems to work. [Instead of receiving complaints, I am notified about abuse of my address occasionally. :)] I disable signatures where people know whether a message is from me actually or whether headers are fake. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/ihgh0iMVcrivHFQRAia4AJ9rNwGy4wMqvLzoc/mMHpCQ/e1uVACdH60g 8x8FSluFSuffjs4nMF2yDcU= =7mzc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
