Sorry to say it guys, but I think you have a pending hardware failure/s
coming on, either I/O or disk from the looks, but then again I guess you
already fear this......somethings happening to the data on its round
trip...
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2/05/00 at 8:00 Ward William E PHDN wrote:
>Hal,
>
>I've got a similar thing happening to a PPro 200 running RH 6.1
>The machine is constantly bellyaching about crash this bad inodes
>that... memtest86 says Nada... nothing wrong with the system. If
>you can eventually figure out what is wrong with your system, please
>let me know... I'd love to fix this sucker back up. I have to reboot
>it at least three times a week to clear up problems.
>
>Bill Ward
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hal Burgiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 11:57 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @nswcphdn.navy.mil
>Subject: Re: umounting / for fsck
>
>
>On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:12:55AM -0500, Bill Carlson wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>> >
>> > Apr 30 04:24:43 localhost kernel: EXT2-fs warning (device ide0(3,4)):
>> > ext2_free_inode: bit already cleared for inode 191777
>>
>> Hal,
>>
>> I've seen errors like these before, 2 or 3 years ago. The problem
>> turned out to be flakey RAM, you might want to test that right
>> away...
>
>Thanks, I'll give that a shot. Curious that e2fsck does not want to
>fix this (at least permaneantly), and seems to be the same inodes
>everytime.
>
>memtest86?
Regards
Greg Wright
IT Consultant Sydney Australia
--
*** Please trim any replies ***
*** Please turn off HTML in your email ***
*** Please don't use the list for test messages ***
*** Why not read the archives? http://moongroup.com/redhat.phtml ***
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
