Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> I was using the above with IP masquerading. Eth0 on the Cisco was set to
> my static IP address, but aliased to 10.0.0.1. I set eth0 on the Linux
> router to 10.0.0.2 (didn't use pump or dhcp in the Linux box), then set
> eth1 in the Linux router (computer) to a LAN address as you've shown
So your setup was like this:
CISCO
eth0:1 public address
eth0:0 10.0.0.1
|
|
eth0 10.0.0.2
LINUX
eth1 public address
eth2 private address
And you could do masquerading? May I ask how? If your Linux box does
masquerading then all packets would seem to be sent from 10.0.0.1 and that
wouldn't work or would it?
> I had some difficulty getting the above to work. As I changed the netmask
> and IP addresses on the LAN so I could subnet, linuxconf didn't delete the
> old routes, even though it added in the new ones. My routing table was a
> real mess! I finally had to go in and modify the routing by hand.
Well, that's one thing I've learned early in the beginning: Never use
Linuxconf!
It has only given me trouble...
Peter
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
