yes,interrupt has to be different for 2 ethernet cards.

Vineeta


Peter Peltonen wrote:

> Vineeta wrote:
> >
> > First of all,are the services ,you mentioned,ftp,telnet e.t.c. running on
> > "antarctis" machine?
>
> Yes they are. I commented telnet and ftp out from /etc/services and restarted
> inetd. I also did ps ax |grep sshd and saw sshd running (and ssh localhost
> works fine). And as I wrote in my previous mail, I've tried this with two
> different servers.
>
> > Just some ideas...
> > Send the o/p of "traceroute" command from the other server till "antarctis".
> > We might be able to dig out something...
>
> Okay. Here is some info about the server:
>
> ifconfig:
> --snip--
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:02:B3:15:06:4D
>           inet addr:193.229.150.130  Bcast:193.229.150.143
> Mask:255.255.255.240
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:14 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0xdf00
>
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:13:E5:53
>           inet addr:172.16.1.254  Bcast:172.16.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0xd000
>
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3924  Metric:1
>           RX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> --snip--
>
> (BTW: does it matter that the interfaces share the same Interrupt?)
>
> route:
> --snip--
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> 172.16.1.254    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth1
> 193.229.150.130 0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth0
> 193.229.150.128 0.0.0.0         255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth0
> 172.16.1.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
> 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
> 0.0.0.0         193.229.150.129 0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
> --snip--
>
> ipchains -L:
> --snip--
> Chain input (policy ACCEPT):
> Chain forward (policy ACCEPT):
> Chain output (policy ACCEPT):
> --snip--
>
> Now, when I do from traceroute ws130.exceco.fi from another host, I get:
> --snip--
>  1  peking (192.168.0.253)  1.722 ms  0.133 ms  0.128 ms
>  2  dmz53.fivetec.com (193.64.3.53)  1.394 ms  2.967 ms  2.877 ms
>  3  r1-Lau1.Hel.FI.KPNQwest.net (193.94.250.67)  2.479 ms  2.472 ms  2.509 ms
>  4  r1-AT1-0-98-Kes2.Hel.FI.KPNQwest.net (212.226.255.86)  3.554 ms  3.416 ms
> 3.372 ms
>  5  r1-AT1-0-2-Tap1.Hel.FI.KPNQwest.net (212.226.250.1)  4.774 ms  4.615 ms
> 4.271 ms
>  6  lanlink-kpnqwest-gw.ficix.fi (193.64.136.6)  5.004 ms  5.067 ms  5.177 ms
>  7  fin1-atm2-0-58.hel.kolumbus.net (193.229.1.37)  6.185 ms  6.495 ms  6.631
> ms
>  8  193.229.72.89 (193.229.72.89)  8.349 ms  6.316 ms  7.248 ms
>  9  k30-kamppi1-fe0.hel.kolumbus.net (193.229.1.246)  7.838 ms  7.922 ms
> 7.907 ms
> 10  193.229.107.190 (193.229.107.190)  18.694 ms  18.050 ms  17.777 ms
> 11  berliini (193.229.150.130)  16.999 ms  18.184 ms  17.138 ms
> --snip--
>
> ping:
> --snip--
> [peter@cayman peter]$ ping ws130.exceco.fi
> PING ws130.exceco.fi (193.229.150.130) from 192.168.0.4 : 56(84) bytes of
> data.
> 64 bytes from berliini (193.229.150.130): icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=22.142 msec
> 64 bytes from berliini (193.229.150.130): icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=20.691 msec
> 64 bytes from berliini (193.229.150.130): icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=19.465 msec
> --snip--
>
> And then ssh and ftp:
> --snip--
> [peter@cayman peter]$ ssh -l root ws130.exceco.fi
> Secure connection to ws130.exceco.fi refused.
> [peter@cayman peter]$ ftp ws130.exceco.fi
> ftp: connect: No route to host
> ftp>
> --snip--
>
> >From another host (in different network) traceroute:
>
> --snip--
> [root@linux /root]# /usr/sbin/traceroute ws130.exceco.fi
> traceroute to ws130.exceco.fi (193.229.150.130), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
>  1  gw (194.188.75.1)  0.951 ms  0.922 ms  0.910 ms
>  2  139.97.206.129 (139.97.206.129)  2.101 ms  1.663 ms  2.722 ms
>  3  172.19.222.17 (172.19.222.17)  66.020 ms  5.001 ms  3.070 ms
>  4  201-ATM1-0-222.lanlink.datatie.net (139.97.0.61)  9.039 ms  11.111 ms
> 8.885 ms
>  5  fin2-atm2-0-201.hel.kolumbus.net (193.229.1.93)  7.190 ms  14.327 ms
> 7.688 ms
>  6  rsm-ka1a-v98.hel.kolumbus.net (193.229.1.186)  11.183 ms  9.003 ms  10.231
> ms
>  7  k30-kamppi1-fe0.hel.kolumbus.net (193.229.1.246)  8.898 ms  10.992 ms
> 8.955 ms
>  8  193.229.107.190 (193.229.107.190)  22.971 ms  21.384 ms  18.404 ms
>  9  ws130.exceco.fi (193.229.150.130)  19.761 ms  17.795 ms  18.201 ms
> --snip--
> (takes a real long time though)
>
> I really don't get this.
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to