actually the most important is to add a "nt" definition for each user (from
win$'s side) to your samba with the "smbpasswd" command : give it the nt
user name and nt password (which may be different from the unix' one)
that's almost all
A 21:32 21/01/2001 -0500, vous avez écrit :
>Yea, but all I have to do is sort out what they say and what they mean which
>is not always clear... ;)
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of badger
>> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 8:12 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Samba and win 2000 pro
>>
>>
>> Read the documentation (RTFM) that came with samba, everything you need to
>> know is in there. :-)
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Rodney Fulk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 2:15 PM
>> Subject: RE: Samba and win 2000 pro
>>
>>
>> > Thanks to those who responded.
>> > It appears now after searching M$'s site that there was a
>> > work around for this. It was he fact that NT (And win2000) wants to send
>> > encrypted passwords to the linux box. I set it to plain text passwords.
>> > Once I figure out the passwords I will change that...
>> >
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edward Dekkers
>> > > Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 9:33 PM
>> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > Subject: Re: Samba and win 2000 pro
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > The problem I am having though is when my win 2000 machine tries to
>> link
>> > > to
>> > > > the linux
>> > > > box this way. The machine is called "Linux" and when I try
>> to connect
>> to
>> > > the
>> > > > Linux box from
>> > > > win 2000 it comes up with the following error window.
>> > > >
>> > > > \\Linux is not accessible.
>> > > > The account is not authorized to log in from this station.
>> > > >
>> > > > Is this a password issue?
>> > >
>> > > Rod, I have no idea whether the following will help you, but
>> to me, your
>> > > smb.conf looks a little...well...short.
>> > > I have the following lines in mine which you make no mention of in
>> yours:
>> > >
>> > > interfaces = 192.168.0.10/16 127.0.0.1/24
>> > > allow hosts = 192.168.
>> > >
>> > > and in each share section:
>> > >
>> > > allow hosts = 192.168.
>> > >
>> > > Theres also a hell of a lot of other options to set valid users - are
>> you
>> > > sure yours are correct? Try reading up on:
>> > >
>> > > user
>> > > admin users
>> > > write list
>> > > valid users
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Edward Dekkers (Director)
>> > > Triple D Computer Services Pty. Ltd.
>> > > 822 Rowley Road
>> > > Oakford W.A. 6121
>> > > +61 8 9397-1040
>> > > ABN: 33 635 238 024
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Redhat-list mailing list
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Redhat-list mailing list
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Redhat-list mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
- * - * - * - * - * - * -
Mes idees n'engagent que moi (vieux proverbe du Net)
Thierry ITTY
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FRANCE
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
