At 09:20 AM 07/03/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>If the RedHat guys can validate their authenticity, run with them...or, if
>you're comfortable enough with the fact that they came from RedHat's site,
>then run with them.
Thanks Mike. Your comments are appreciated.
>On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 07 March 2001 08:35, you wrote:
> > > GPG signatures are used to ensure the authenticity of the package,
> that it
> > > came from who it was supposed to.
> > >
> > > I'd be a little wary of the packages, unless someone from RedHat can
> > > confirm their authenticity for you.
> > >
> >
> > Oh? That seems to make sense. But these files are from the RedHat Update
> > site? Now what?
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Question -
> > > >
> > > > I was trying to use up2date this morning and found that on all the
> > packages
> > > > it said:
> > > >
> > > > 'this package .....not signed with a GPG signature. Continue?
> > > >
> > > > What does that mean? Is that a problem??
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
---
Ted Gervais
1-902-679-2253
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia Canada.
***********************************************
Be alert, the world needs more lerts
***********************************************
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
