On Tue, 01 May 2001 08:11:02 John Horne wrote:
>On 30-Apr-01 at 15:51:51 rpjday wrote:
>> in either case, you're better off using the */15 syntax i mentioned
>> earlier.
>>
>Why is that 'better'? I still use the old (?) syntax of '0,15,30,45' which
>seems to work just as well.
Because */15 really means every 15 minutes. Your solution actually specifes
specific minutes in which to run the job. The result is the same, but the
*/15 syntax matches better with what was originally requested (every 15
minutes).
Tony
--
Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
PGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
Chat: AOL/Yahoo: TonyG05 ICQ: 91183266
Linux. The choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
