hi
Download:
- http://www.net-snmp.org/download/
-
ftp://ftp.net-snmp.org/pub/sourceforge/net-snmp/ucd-snmp.tar.gz
Mirrors:-
US:ftp://ftp.freesnmp.com/mirrors/net-snmp/
There are binaries for some systems available in the
binaries directory on the ftp site Simple Network
Management Protocol. Some basic suite should compile
and run on Win32 platforms.
Thanks
Raj
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send
Redhat-list mailing list submissions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
>
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Redhat-list digest..."
>
> > Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: FTP problems in RH 7.1 (Dan Simoes)
> 2. hylaFAX --> .tif (ramzez)
> 3. about servers of news (ramzez)
> 4. Re: FTP problems in RH 7.1 (Francisco Neira)
> 5. Re: SRPMS (Manuel Camacho)
> 6. RE: confuse with errata to rpm nicely (Paul
> Hamm)
> 7. Re: ntpd doesn't use distant servers time
> (Dumas Patrice)
> 8. new perl package. (Jeff Bearer)
> 9. Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from
> internal windoze machines
> to linux firewall (gateway) (Greg Caskey)
> 10. RE: confuse with errata to rpm nicely (Ismael
> Touama)
> 11. ucd-snmp interfaces? (Devon Harding - GTHLA)
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.1 message/rfc822
> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 07:25:01 -0500
> From: Dan Simoes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FTP problems in RH 7.1
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks for the reply. It's not quite that simple,
> but in replying to
> your note you actually helped me work through a few
> things in my mind
> (some sleep helped too!)
>
> As I mentioned before, ftp is enabled and runs if I
> ftp localhost.
> I can also telnet to port 21 on the box.
>
> I've since remembered that ftp uses control and data
> ports, which is why
> telnet to port 21 works. Things I have tried are
> overriding DNS reverse
> lookups in /etc/ftpaccess, and I am looking into
> some of the passive
> mode configurations.
>
> I see the exact same behavior on my home system
> which running 7.2.
> My home box is addressed as 192.168.1.10. On that
> box, I can ftp to
> localhost, but if I try to ftp to the box from
> another client on the
> network, the connection is "closed by remote host."
> syslog shows only:
>
> Mar 8 07:17:02 cyclops ftpd[1499]: lost connection
> to 192.168.1.101
> [192.168.1.101]
> Mar 8 07:17:02 cyclops ftpd[1499]: FTP session
> closed
>
> The machine does not have a FQDN, is addressed as
> 192.168.1.10.
> The client is using a DHCP address which also does
> not exist in DNS.
> I tried adding the DCHP address to /etc/hosts and it
> now allows the
> connection, though it is still quite slow to
> connect.
>
> Should I try grabbing wuftpd source and recompiling
> without DNS support,
> or are there other config parameters I should
> explore?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> aftab alam wrote:
> >
> > hi
> > You go to /etc/xinetd.d and see the file
> wu-ftpd. If there is any entry
> > like "disable yes". You just comment this line and
> reboot the system.
> >
> > Dan Simoes wrote:
> >
> > > New to this list, so hi all.
> > >
> > > I have seen reports of this problem before, with
> no conclusive solution.
> > >
> > > On a fresh 7.1 install, I can ftp localhost
> without a problem on the
> > > box.
> > > Remote ftp sessions connect, then are "closed by
> remote host".
> > > syslog shows nothing interesting.
> > >
> > > I have checked:
> > > - hosts.allow/deny
> > > - ftpaccess/ftpuser/etc
> > > - ipchains
> > >
> > > I've even watched tcpdump traffic and still
> don't see anything obvious.
> > >
> > > One interesting thing - ftp to the box fails,
> but telnet to port 21
> > > works, and I can login with USER and PASS and do
> a pwd.
> > > Boggles the mind, doesn't it?
> > >
> > > My coworkers urge me to just get an updated rpm
> or use proftpd, but I'd
> > > like to know why this is failing. I suspect
> something to do with
> > > tcpwrappers and reverse lookups, but I'm not
> sure. Like I said, I'm not
> > > the first to see this problem.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
> > --
> >
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Aftab Alam
> > Computer Centre
> > IIT Kanpur
> > Phone:- 0512-597447(O)
> > 0512-598598(R)
> > email:- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.2 message/rfc822
> From: ramzez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: hylaFAX --> .tif
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:04:46 -0500
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi...
> I'm using hylaFAX and I wonder what is the best
> format for receive fax? I
> receive in .tif format... if there are some better
> format, how do I change
> for this??
>
> thanks
> - --
> Linux User
> Registered #232544
> http://counter.li.org/
> my GnuPG-key at
> www.keyserver.net
> - --- rm -rf /bin/laden ---
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>
iD8DBQE8iCpUs4dF9gl05swRAowkAJ9QSkR7ekktynM96Jj+CZwU2W8ZRgCgq8Wh
> /0sswmKYZWx5IhAPaaWHQKY=
> =Khp8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.3 message/rfc822
> From: ramzez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: about servers of news
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:06:09 -0500
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
> I want to suscribe from some server of news but I
> dont know how do that...
> wich app I have to use and How do I configure this??
>
> thanks
>
> - --
> Linux User
> Registered #232544
> http://counter.li.org/
> my GnuPG-key at
> www.keyserver.net
> - --- rm -rf /bin/laden ---
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>
iD8DBQE8iCqos4dF9gl05swRAjPLAJ0dFpWz4/Bp6P0BPYalh3WbBwnBHQCfRm8t
> Mp6mNMio66oOSVSuiR2jY7A=
> =/JQQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.4 message/rfc822
> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 08:31:59 -0500
> From: "Francisco Neira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: FTP problems in RH 7.1
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> No need to reboot. Just restart the
>
> Francisco Neira Basso
> Administrador de Red
> Defensoria del Pueblo
> Lima, Peru. -05:00 GMT
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/02 22:35 >>>
> hi
> You go to /etc/xinetd.d and see the file
> wu-ftpd. If there is any entry
> like "disable yes". You just comment this line and
> reboot the system.
>
> Dan Simoes wrote:
>
> > New to this list, so hi all.
> >
> > I have seen reports of this problem before, with
> no conclusive solution.
> >
> > On a fresh 7.1 install, I can ftp localhost
> without a problem on the
> > box.
> > Remote ftp sessions connect, then are "closed by
> remote host".
> > syslog shows nothing interesting.
> >
> > I have checked:
> > - hosts.allow/deny
> > - ftpaccess/ftpuser/etc
> > - ipchains
> >
> > I've even watched tcpdump traffic and still don't
> see anything obvious.
> >
> > One interesting thing - ftp to the box fails, but
> telnet to port 21
> > works, and I can login with USER and PASS and do a
> pwd.
> > Boggles the mind, doesn't it?
> >
> > My coworkers urge me to just get an updated rpm or
> use proftpd, but I'd
> > like to know why this is failing. I suspect
> something to do with
> > tcpwrappers and reverse lookups, but I'm not sure.
> Like I said, I'm not
> > the first to see this problem.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
> --
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Aftab Alam
> Computer Centre
> IIT Kanpur
> Phone:- 0512-597447(O)
> 0512-598598(R)
> email:- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.5 message/rfc822
> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 09:03:53 -0600
> From: "Manuel Camacho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SRPMS
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The rpms that are architechture independent have
> "noarch" somewhere in
> their names. Compilers are in charge of matching
> your source with the
> actual architecture you have, so you do not
> necessarilly have to learn
> architecture specific code, and you achieve high
> portability. But, some
> processes are better performed if you make routines
> in machine language
> and use the best capabilities of your hardware, and
> if you use them, then
> your programs become hardware dependent.
>
> A good example is Linux itself. It exploits the
> characteristics of 32 bit
> processors, but it wont work in 8 or 16 bit
> processors. So Linux for INTEL
> is dependent on the processor family.
>
> Best regards,
>
> -Manuel.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Ismael Touama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:47:06 +0100
> Subject: SRPMS
>
> > Hi, in the flow!
> > OK I remark that we can download Source of RPMs.
> > There is just one for many architectures
> available.
> > Ok, don't know C language, so I suppose that it's
> the
> > compilation which provides all different version.
> > Is that correct ?
> > It means one source for differents architecture
> but I don't understand
> > why some architectures are affected and other not.
> > Which is the thing determine that ? one source for
> severals
> > architecture,
> > it's kind of weird to me.
> >
> > ism (loves weird)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.6 message/rfc822
> From: Paul Hamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: confuse with errata to rpm nicely
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:08:58 -0500
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Err Ed how is downloading 4 iso images on a regular
> basis for people with
> slow connections going to help them out? rsync
> running on cron will
> download all the updates available in the middle of
> the night that you have
> not already got. And replacing the old packages
> with the new ones in an iso
> image is not that difficult after that first batch
> of patches.
>
> Ism
> As Ed stated most of the Redhat patches are to close
> security holes and fix
> known bugs. The only ones you really need to
> install are the ones that can
> be abused for security but if you are not using say
> wu-ftp then you really
> don't need to patch it as no matter how many holes
> it has you can not be
> effected by them if you are not using the offending
> package. If you plan on
> installing lots of linux machines or maybe just
> install the same machine
> several times I would recommend that you creating a
> custom distibution which
> contains all the errata to date. It makes the
> install much faster. Check
> through the forums for custom distro and genhdlist
> if you are interested.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: confuse with errata to rpm nicely
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:12:40PM +0100, Ismael
> Touama wrote:
> > I am really disturbing with my linux learning, I
> read all the day severals
> > doc to understand in order to do the things kind
> properly.
> > According to the vulnerability in Netfilter, I say
> to me cool my first
> > update
> > (or upgrade - don't know-) with rpm command line.
> But I read in /errata
> > (CAN-2002-0060)
> > that I needed to be up to date with these rpm to
> apply this one. What the
> > hell !!
>
> > PS:this what disturbed me
> > "...Before applying this update, make sure all
> previously released errata
> > relevant to your system have been applied..."
>
> All the Red Hat errata say that. Sometimes they
> mean it and sometimes they
> don't. What you have to realize is that almost all
> of errata fix security
> or
> major bugs, so you really should apply them and keep
> yourself up to date.
> Rarely do errata offer new features or upgrades to
> specific packages -
> that's
> why, for example, Red Hat patched php3 for Red Hat
> Linux 6.2 rather than go
> straight to php4. You get much better compatibility
> this way.
>
> So, the bottom line is that you try to patch just
> netfilter and see if you
> get
> any dependency failures, and if not, you're done.
> If you do get a
> dependency
> failure, then apply the dependencies as Red Hat
> suggested. You should,
> however, at your earliest convenience, apply all the
> errata. This is no
> different than any other major computer OS vendor.
>
> What Red Hat really needs to produce is 7.2-1 which
> has all the errata in it
> up to a certain date and let people download the iso
> and do upgrades that
> way.
> Especially for new installations in areas with poor
> network connectivity,
> this
> would save many hours or even days of work. You
> know, almost like service
> pak 1...
>
> --
> Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.7 message/rfc822
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 16:08:56 +0100
> From: Dumas Patrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: RedHat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: ntpd doesn't use distant servers time
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >
> > Reachability for all the listed timeservers is 0,
> which means you have
> > never had a successful connect. Check your
> firewall logs, or do an
> > ntptrace. Chances are, the packets are being
> rejected at your side or
> > theirs.
>
> I did a ntptrace, It gives:
> [root@zeus lts_kmap]# ntptrace -d -v -t 40
> ntp.tuxfamily.net
> DoTransmit(80.67.179.2)
> DoTransmit to 80.67.179.2
> timeout
> [ repeated 4 times ]
> sherkan.tuxfamily.net: *Timeout*
>
> I think the problem lies on my side because these
> are public timeservers for my
> zone. I think I have no firewall on my computer. And
> I don't administer the one
> which are on the way. However, it seems to me that
> they accept any outgoing
> connection. Is there a need for ingoing connection
> for ntp ?
>
> What could I do to understand what happens ? Is
> there any tool which could be
> used to follow a packet and know where a firewall
> blocked it ?
>
> Pat
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.8 message/rfc822
> Subject: new perl package.
> From: Jeff Bearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 08 Mar 2002 10:26:04 -0500
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >From past experience I've found that upgrading perl
> always whacks all
> the modules that I have installed, the problem is
> that I'm not sure that
> I have installed. What is an easy way to see what
> non RPM modules are
> installed?
>
> --
> Jeff Bearer, RHCE
> Webmaster
> PittsburghLIVE.com
> 2002 EPpy Award, Best Online U.S. Newspaper
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.9 message/rfc822
> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 08:55:01 -0700
> From: Greg Caskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from
> internal windoze machines
> to linux firewall (gateway)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello...
>
> Thank you to everyone that has helped out on this.
> Should I be running Bind
> 9.x on this machine?
>
> Greg
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emmanuel Seyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from
> internal windoze
> machines to linux firewall (gateway)
>
>
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Greg
> Caskey wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. The 2nd NIC's IP address is 10.0.0.1 for the
> internal machines.
> Would my
> > > named.conf look like this:
> > >
> > > options {
> > > directory "/var/named";
> > > };
> >
> > Make it this:
> >
> > options {
> > directory "/var/named";
> > forwarders { ISP backup 1 IP; ISP backup 2
> IP; };
> > forward only;
> > listen-on { 10.0.0.1; };
> > };
> >
> > > Or should it be for 10.0.0.1 instead of
> 127.0.0.1?
> >
> > Nope. All DNS servers are masters for 127.0.0
> since 127.0.0.1
> > always points to the local machine.
> >
> > > 2. The /etc/resolv.conf file should be as
> follows with my server as the
> > > caching server?
> >
> > Brillant.
> >
> > > Is there anything else I need to setup?
> >
> > You'll need the /var/named/named.local file
> specified in named.conf .
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.10 message/rfc822
> From: "Ismael Touama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: confuse with errata to rpm nicely
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:03:27 +0100
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> OK thank you,
>
> I'm kind of disturbing cause it lacks me a lot of
> linux concept or
> calling terms, by the way, I have to install this
> new kernell realease
> cause i'm having IRC installed and just to be up to
> date, isn't it.
> I intend to do so to cultivate myself to linux word
> (kind of old papy
> grummbling
> always the same !!?).
> For the moment I try to ... transfer my rpm
> downloaded from my MS PC via a
> CD-RW !!
> Hard! but it's fun... not yet really easy with the
> fs.
> I'll automatise that with pretty good bash treatment
> or cron later when more
> comfurtable.
>
> Really thanks,
> ism
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> Paul Hamm
> Envoyé : vendredi 8 mars 2002 16:09
> À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Objet : RE: confuse with errata to rpm nicely
>
>
> Err Ed how is downloading 4 iso images on a regular
> basis for people with
> slow connections going to help them out? rsync
> running on cron will
> download all the updates available in the middle of
> the night that you have
> not already got. And replacing the old packages
> with the new ones in an iso
> image is not that difficult after that first batch
> of patches.
>
> Ism
> As Ed stated most of the Redhat patches are to close
> security holes and fix
> known bugs. The only ones you really need to
> install are the ones that can
> be abused for security but if you are not using say
> wu-ftp then you really
> don't need to patch it as no matter how many holes
> it has you can not be
> effected by them if you are not using the offending
> package. If you plan on
> installing lots of linux machines or maybe just
> install the same machine
> several times I would recommend that you creating a
> custom distibution which
> contains all the errata to date. It makes the
> install much faster. Check
> through the forums for custom distro and genhdlist
> if you are interested.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: confuse with errata to rpm nicely
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:12:40PM +0100, Ismael
> Touama wrote:
> > I am really disturbing with my linux learning, I
> read all the day severals
> > doc to understand in order to do the things kind
> properly.
> > According to the vulnerability in Netfilter, I say
> to me cool my first
> > update
> > (or upgrade - don't know-) with rpm command line.
> But I read in /errata
> > (CAN-2002-0060)
> > that I needed to be up to date with these rpm to
> apply this one. What the
> > hell !!
>
> > PS:this what disturbed me
> > "...Before applying this update, make sure all
> previously released errata
> > relevant to your system have been applied..."
>
> All the Red Hat errata say that. Sometimes they
> mean it and sometimes they
> don't. What you have to realize is that almost all
> of errata fix security
> or
> major bugs, so you really should apply them and keep
> yourself up to date.
> Rarely do errata offer new features or upgrades to
> specific packages -
> that's
> why, for example, Red Hat patched php3 for Red Hat
> Linux 6.2 rather than go
> straight to php4. You get much better compatibility
> this way.
>
> So, the bottom line is that you try to patch just
> netfilter and see if you
> get
> any dependency failures, and if not, you're done.
> If you do get a
> dependency
> failure, then apply the dependencies as Red Hat
> suggested. You should,
> however, at your earliest convenience, apply all the
> errata. This is no
> different than any other major computer OS vendor.
>
> What Red Hat really needs to produce is 7.2-1 which
> has all the errata in it
> up to a certain date and let people download the iso
> and do upgrades that
> way.
> Especially for new installations in areas with poor
> network connectivity,
> this
> would save many hours or even days of work. You
> know, almost like service
> pak 1...
>
> --
> Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
> ATTACHMENT part 3.11 message/rfc822
> From: Devon Harding - GTHLA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ucd-snmp interfaces?
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:53:50 -0500
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have ucd-snmp 4.2.1 installed. When I do snmpwalk
> localhost public, I see
> no info regarding Ethernet interfaces. But when I
> do the same thing against
> a router or switch, it displays everything. How can
> I get snmpd it to
> display Ethernet and other system info?
>
> __________________
> Devon Harding
> System Administrator
> Gilat Latin America
> 954-858-1600
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This e-mail is intended for the above named
> addressee(s), and may contain
> information which is confidential or privileged. If
> you are not the intended
> recipient, please inform us immediately: you should
> not copy or use this
> e-mail for any purpose nor disclose its contents to
> any person.
>
> > _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
