-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan Stromberg wrote:
>Thank you for recognizing that admins have more useful things to do with >their time than a steady stream of redhat upgrades. As Ed points out, that really shouldn't be an issue for you. There's no compelling reason for you, the admin, to chase release numbers. Red Hat's decision sounds like it has more to do with getting software partners on board ... developers of enterprise software are the ones with probably the biggest axe to grind there, since they have a lot of work to do every time the OS is upgraded: http://newsforge.com/newsforge/02/03/28/1656233.shtml?tid=23 - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPKUo7L9BpdPKTBGtEQLQgACghUFFqVYMjTuV5rXvilysA+y8O58Anj8P 5Eb/raUTXK0EztDse1yKK1XF =Rskc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
